Principles of Radiography Research

Order 100% Plagiarism & AI-Free Paper Now

Assessment Overview Aims

This module aims to support you on your journey to become an inspired, informed, and reflective radiographer able to discuss, evaluate and apply the use of research to inform and innovate within the field of radiography.

Learning Outcomes Knowledge and understanding

• Critically discuss the principles underpinning quantitative and qualitative research design. • Evaluate methods of sampling, data collection and data analysis. • Critically discuss the principles that underpin research governance.

Skills

• Demonstrate the use of research related terminology.
• Critically appraise research papers using appropriate frameworks.
• Develop a research proposal.
• Write in an accurate and concise style, using presentation, grammar and referencing skills.

Values and attitudes

• Respect the value of research to the critical evaluation of practice.
• Respect ethical and research frameworks that underpin, inform, and influence the practice of radiography.

Assessment Details You will critically appraise the following research article:

Donkor, A., Anyitey-Kokor, I., Osei Tutu, E., Bosomtwe, D., Adjei, A. and Waife, Y. (2024) ‘Work-related back pain among diagnostic radiographers in Ghana: A qualitative study’, Radiography, 30(4), pp. 1187-1193.

Your critical appraisal will follow a systematic process to identify the strengths and limitations of the research article to assess its usefulness and the validity of the research findings. The word count for the critical appraisal is 1500 words. You must use the following critical appraisal tool to structure your critical appraisal. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2018) CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. [online] Available at: casp-qualitative-studies-checklist-fillable.pdf (casp-uk.net)

Principles of Radiography Research

Order 100% Plagiarism & AI-Free Paper Now

Your critical appraisal must consider the following questions:

1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?
2. Is a qualitative methodology appropriate?
3. Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?
4. Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research?
5. Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?
6. Has the relationship between researcher and participant been adequately considered?
7. Have ethical issues been taken into consideration?
8. Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous?
9. Is there a clear statement of findings?
10. How valuable is the research? You must use accurate research related terminology throughout the critical appraisal.

You cannot answer simply by providing yes/no responses. You must justify your response using appropriate research related terminology, and suitable literature to support the narrative.

Word Count

Your word count includes all words and characters that make up the body of your work. This includes any headings, tables, diagrams, quotations and citations. It does not include the title of your work. It does not include reference lists or bibliographies at the end of your work. It also does not include information contained in any appendices.

Referencing •

All sections of the essay require support using reputable literature (use the reading list to guide you). In-text citations must be evident throughout. • You must correctly cite and reference the sources that you use throughout the work using the Harvard System.

Marking Criteria:

The pass mark for this assessment is 40%. You are required to achieve the minimum pass mark. This assessment contributes to 50% of the overall module mark. Please find the marking criteria below. They are descriptions, based on the module’s learning outcomes, of the skills, knowledge, or attributes you need to demonstrate to successfully complete an assessment. Your feedback will be based on them. The marking criteria have a proportion of marks allocated to them.

Principles of Radiography Research

Order 100% Plagiarism & AI-Free Paper Now

Marking Criteria: Proportion of marks

Ability to construct a critical appraisal considering the underpinning principles of research design and rigor in research using accurate research related terminology throughout 70 marks

Appreciation of the value of the study to the practice of radiography 10 marks

Clear professional writing style, organised information in a logical way 10 marks

Demonstrate appropriate reading and accurate referencing throughout using the Harvard referencing system. 10 marks

Grade-related Criteria

Please also consult the Grade Related Criteria in the Programme Handbook for descriptions of the level of skills, knowledge, or attributes you need to demonstrate to achieve a certain grade or mark in an assessment.

Generative AI

The assessment must be completed without any assistance from generative AI tools. Procedure

Submission Requirements

• You must submit your assignment online only via Moodle Drop box.
• You must submit your work as one Microsoft Word file (doc or docx). No other file formats will be accepted.
• Note, draft versions will not be marked, please ensure that you have fully submitted your work using the submit button.
• You must include a completed assignment front sheet.
• You must submit the assignment front sheet as a separate document.
• You must format your work using Arial font type, font size 11 and 1.5 line spacing.

Marking and Moderation Process

This assessment will be marked anonymously. Before marking it will be checked by the Turnitin system to highlight similarity with other sources in its database – this is vast and includes submissions from students from around the world, papers, books, and internet resources. The marker will see areas of overlap highlighted on the submission that they mark and will check that there is no evidence of plagiarism or collusion. Please ensure you follow good academic practice – there are lots of resources online to help (you can start here: https://studenthub.city.ac.uk/help-and-support/improve-your-study-skills). Marking quality is assured through a sampling moderation process – a sample of around 10% of submissions are read by a second academic member of staff (the moderator) and the marks and feedback checked for consistency against the submissions, as well as comparing with previous cohorts and other module marks. Changes may be made to ensure consistency. An external examiner then checks the finalised marks and can suggest changes. For information relating to marking and moderation please see the Radiography Programme Handbook.

Feedback

You will receive feedback in the following format:

• In-text highlighting and commenting on specific points of a coursework essay.
• Scores on individual marking criteria given in a rubric. The date for the release of marks and feedback will be published via the Moodle module.

Sanctions For information relating to possible sanctions please review the SHPS Submission Process found in the Radiography Programme Handbook Moodle module. Please ensure that you follow the guidance about good academic practice, plagiarism prevention and writing appropriately in assignments. This information can be found within the Assessment Regulation 19 and in the Academic Integrity & Misconduct Policy and Guidance

Principles of Radiography Research

Order 100% Plagiarism & AI-Free Paper Now

By admin in Blog on January 16, 2025