NR320 Scholarly Article Review

NR320 Scholarly Article Review Guidelines

Guidelines for Scholarly Article Review

PURPOSE The student will review, summarize, and critique a scholarly article related to a mental health nursing topic.

COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO #5 Utilize available resources to meet self-identified goals for personal, professional, and educational development appropriate to the mental health setting. (PO #5)

CO #7 Examine moral, ethical, legal, and professional standards and principles as a basis for clinical decision making. (PO #6)

CO #9 Utilize research findings as a basis for the development of a group leadership experience. (PO #8)

DUE DATE: See Course Calendar. The college’s Late Assignment Policy applies to this activity.

POINTS POSSIBLE: 100 points

REQUIREMENTS 1. Select a scholarly nursing or research article (published within the last five years) related to mental health

nursing, which includes content related to evidence-based practice.

*** You may need to evaluate several articles before you find one that is appropriate. ***

2. Ensure that no other member of your clinical group chooses the same article. Submit the article for approval.

3. Write a 2–3 page paper (excluding the title and reference pages) using the following criteria.

 Write a brief introduction of the topic and why it is important to mental health nursing.  Cite statistics to support the significance of the topic.  Summarize the article; include key points or findings of the article.  Discuss how you could use the information for your practice; give specific examples.  Identify strengths and weaknesses of the article.  Discuss whether or not you would recommend the article to other colleagues.  Write a conclusion.

4. Paper must follow APA format. Include a title page and a reference page; use 12-point Times Roman font; and include in-text citations (use citations whenever paraphrasing, using statistics, or quoting from the article). Please refer to your APA Manual as a guide for in-text citations and sample reference pages.

5. Submit per faculty instructions by due date (see Course Calendar); attach article with the review.

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR320 Mental Health Nursing

NR320 Scholarly Article Review

Order 100% plagiarism free essay onNR320 Scholarly Article Review

DIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIA Assignment

Criteria Points % Description

Introduction 10 10 • An effective introduction establishes the purpose of the paper. • The introduction should capture the attention of the reader.

Article summary 30 30 Summary of article must include the following. • Statistics to support the significance of the topic • Key points and findings of the article • Discussion of how information from the article could be used in your practice (give specific

examples)

Article critique 30 30 Article critique must include the following. • Strengths and weaknesses of the article • Discussion of whether you would recommend the article to a colleague

Conclusion 15 15 The conclusion statement should be well-defined and clearly stated. An effective conclusion provides analysis and/or synthesis of information which relates to the main idea/topic of the paper. The conclusion is supported by ideas presented throughout the body of your report.

Article Selection & Approval

5 5 • Article is relevant to mental health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

• No duplicate articles within the clinical group. • Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

Grammar/Spelling/ Mechanics APA format

10 10 • Correct use of Standard English grammar and sentence structure • No spelling or typographical errors • Document includes title and reference pages • Citations in the text and reference page

Total 100 100

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR320 Mental Health Nursing

NR320 Scholarly Article Review Guidelines.docx Revised 7/11/2013 3

GRADING RUBRIC

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance

B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance F (0–75%)

Introduction (10 points)

NR320 Scholarly Article Review

Order 100% plagiarism free essay onNR320 Scholarly Article Review

• Introduction is present and distinctly establishes the purpose of paper.

• Introduction is appealing and promptly captures the attention of the reader.

10 points

• Introduction is present and generally establishes the purpose of paper

• Introduction has appeal and generally captures the attention of the reader.

9 points

• Introduction is present and generally establishes the purpose of paper.

8 points

• No introduction

0–7 points

Article summary (30 points)

• Statistics presented strongly support the significance of the topic

• Key points and findings of the article are clearly stated

• Thoroughly discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by giving two or more specific, relevant examples.

28–30 points

• Statistics presented moderately support the significance of the topic

• Key points and findings of the article are vaguely stated

• Adequately discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by one specific, relevant, example.

26-27 points

• Statistics presented weakly support the significance of the topic

• Key points and findings of the article are stated in a manner that is confusing or difficult to understand

• Briefly discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by giving examples that are not specific, yet remain relevant.

23- 25 points

• Statistics presented do not support the significance of the topic OR no statistics are presented.

• Key points and findings of the article are incorrectly presented OR missing

• Briefly discusses how information from the article could be used in your practice by giving examples that are neither specific, nor relevant. OR implications to practice not discussed.

0-22 points

NR320 Scholarly Article Review

Order 100% plagiarism free essay onNR320 Scholarly Article Review

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance

B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance F (0–75%)

Article critique (30 points)

• Excellent critique of article demonstrating analysis and original thinking

• Strengths and weaknesses of the article thoroughly examined

• Recommendations of the article to a colleague show thoughtful application of critical thinking

28–30 points

• Adequate critique of article demonstrating analysis and original thinking

• Strengths and weaknesses of the article briefly examined

• Recommendations of the article to a colleague show elements of critical thinking

26-27 points

• Critique of article present and demonstrates understanding of the article’s contents

• Strengths and weaknesses of the article minimally examined

• Recommendations of the article to a colleague show thoughtful application of critical thinking

23- 25 points

• Critique of article does not relate to content of article OR missing

• Strengths and weaknesses of the article NOT examined

• Recommendation of the article made to an inappropriate colleague OR not made

0-22 points

Conclusion (10 points)

• The conclusion statement is well-defined and clearly stated.

• Conclusion demonstrates comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

• The conclusion is strongly supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

10 points

• The conclusion statement is general and clearly stated.

• Conclusion demonstrates comprehensive analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

• The conclusion is strongly supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

9 points

• The conclusion statement is general and clearly stated.

• Conclusion demonstrates adequate analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

• The conclusion is adequately supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

8 points

• The conclusion statement is vague or not stated.

• Conclusion demonstrates inadequate analysis or synthesis of information from the article.

• The conclusion is inadequately supported by ideas presented throughout the body of the paper.

0–7 points

Article Selection & Approval (5 Points)

ALL Items MET: • Article is relevant to mental

health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

• No duplicate articles within the clinical group.

• Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

5 points

ONE item NOT MET: • Article is relevant to mental

health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

• No duplicate articles within the clinical group.

• Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

4 points

2 or more items NOT MET: • Article is relevant to mental

health nursing practice and is current (within 5 years of publication).

• No duplicate articles within the clinical group.

• Article submitted and approved as scholarly by instructor.

0-3 points

NR320 Scholarly Article Review

Order 100% plagiarism free essay onNR320 Scholarly Article Review

Assignment Criteria

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

A (92–100%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance

B (84–91%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

C (76–83%)

Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of

Performance F (0–75%)

Grammar/Spelling/M echanics APA format (10 points)

• References are submitted with assignment.

• Used appropriate APA format and are free of errors.

• Includes title and reference pages.

• Grammar and mechanics are free of errors.

10 points

• References are submitted with assignment.

• Used appropriate APA format, but has one type of error.

• Includes title and reference pages.

• Grammar and mechanics have one type of error.

9 points

• References are submitted with assignment.

• Used appropriate APA format, but have two types of errors.

• Includes title and reference pages.

• Grammar and mechanics have two types of errors.

8 points

• No references submitted with assignment.

• Attempts made to use APA format, but have three or more types of errors.

• Includes title and reference pages.

• Grammar and mechanics have three or more types of errors.

0–7 points

Total Points Possible = 100 points