Medical Indications

Order 100% Plagiarism Paper Now

Beneficence and Nonmaleficence: Medical indications represent the elements of a clinical discussion, including patient assessment, facts, and opinions that help make correct diagnoses. The elements help providers deliver quality care to improve patient outcomes. This position is supported by Orr (2015), who alleges that the purpose of treatment is to enhance healthcare outcomes.  Beneficence and maleficence principles are important in the provision of care. The providers depend on maximizing positive health outcomes of treatment. Non-maleficence requires that providers not intentionally inflict harm or pain on the patient. Meilaender (2013) alleges that medical ethics safeguards the well-being of patients in treatment administration. Similarly, beneficence can foster the delivery of patient-centered cases based on medical indications (Lawrence, 2007). The patient’s signs and symptoms are often adequate for providers to diagnose accurately. For example, James’s condition requires immediate action from the physician to manage the acute glomerulonephritis arising from a strep throat infection. This would help in preventing the deliberate infliction of pain.

References

Beever, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2016). Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 275           291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9633-5

Carr, M. F., & Winslow, G. R. (2017). From conceptual to concrete. In world religions for            healthcare professionals (pp. 31-45). Routledge.

Gillon, R. (2018). Principlism, virtuism, and the spirit of oneness. In healthcare ethics, law and      professionalism (pp. 45-59). Routledge.

Lawrence, D. J. (2007). The four principles of biomedical ethics: A foundation for current            bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, 14, 34-40. Retrieved from        https://cursa.ihmc.us/rid=1N9LFPNVN-N2R6ZC         1YP2/The%20Four%20Principles%20of%20Biomedical%20Ethics_A%20Foundation      20for%20Current%20Bioethical%20Debate.pdf

Meilaender, G. (2013). Bioethics: A primer for Christians (3rd ed.). Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B.    Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Orr, R. D. (2015). Incorporating spirituality into patient care. AMA Journal of Ethics, 17(5), 409   415. Retrieved from https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/incorporating          spirituality-patient-care/2015-05

Tags: Contextual Features, How might a Christian rank the priority of the four principles, Medical Indications, Part 2: Evaluation, Patient Preferences, Quality of Life

By admin in Blog on September 24, 2022