Benchmark-Patient Spiritual needs: Case analysis

Order 100% Plagiarism Free Essay Now

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.

The physician should allow Mike to continue making decisions for James. Since James is only 8 years old, he cannot make informed decisions. Evidence shows that fully autonomous patients do not have complete rights to decide treatment action (Meilaender, 2013). Patients should be allowed to give a say in treatment in patient delivery. Besides, treatment is delivered by physicians who out themselves and license in the line of duty. Based on this fact, there should be equal responsibility and respect between the physician and patient, in this case, James’ parents. Furthermore, the physician should provide Mike with adequate and relevant information on how to treat his son. If Mike declines a kidney transplant, any decision the physician considers irrational and harmful to James, the physician has the responsibility to try and talk to Mike. Additionally, if they cannot reach a consensus on how to treat James, then the patient-provider relationship cannot continue. Even though it might appear that the physician is abandoning his duties, it is unacceptable to proceed with treatment if the physician believes the decision is irrational. On the other hand, James’ parents should not consent to treatment if the move is to appease the physician. In the Christian worldview, refusal of treatment can result from various facts, for instance, if the treatment is considered irrelevant and extremely burdensome (Meilaender, 2013). However, in the case of James, treatment is necessary, and the physician and Mike should reach an agreement. Failing to prioritize James’ health could worsen his condition.